Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LONESOME PINE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 06:48 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LONESOME PINE HOSPITAL
CCN 490114 | VA | 56 beds | Current EBITDA $30.1M → Pro Forma $39.4M (+$9.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$175.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$30.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$9.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$39.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$6.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$9.2M
Modeled Uplift
$6.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $6.8M (vs $9.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$112K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$9.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.5M$3.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.4M$97K$3.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$539K$1.6M$2.1M$6.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$112K$112K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT33.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$878K$1.8M$2.6M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$869K$1.7M$2.6M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$712K$1.4M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$56K$112K$112K$112K$112K$112K$112K
Cumulative$0$2.5M$5.0M$7.5M$9.2M$9.2M$9.2M$9.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $9.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x
9.0x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x
10.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x
11.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x
12.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x44% / 6.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.0x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.5x, adding 2.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$30.1M$30.1M17.2%
Year 1$31.0M+$6.2M$37.2M21.2%
Year 2$32.0M+$9.2M$41.2M23.5%
Year 3$32.9M+$9.2M$42.2M24.0%
Year 4$33.9M+$9.2M$43.1M24.6%
Year 5$34.9M+$9.2M$44.2M25.2%
$301.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$485.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$184.5M
Value Created
$44.2M
Exit EBITDA
$48.0M
Organic Growth
$92.4M
RCM Value Creation
$44.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.8M$2.6M$3.5M$4.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.7M$2.6M$3.5M$4.2M
A/R Days Reduction$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.6M
Clean Claim Rate$56K$84K$112K$135K
Total$4.6M$6.9M$9.2M$11.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 52 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin17.2%-9.7%6.2%15.3%
P79
Net-to-Gross21.1%20.9%27.1%33.6%
P25
Occupancy64.7%39.8%54.7%75.0%
P60
Rev/Bed$3.1M$386K$668K$1.7M
P98
Exp/Bed$2.6M$429K$752K$1.6M
P92

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML