Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — RICHMOND COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:33 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — RICHMOND COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
CCN 490094 | VA | 96 beds | Current EBITDA $54.9M → Pro Forma $68.3M (+$13.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$254.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$54.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$13.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$68.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$9.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$13.4M
Modeled Uplift
$8.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $8.9M (vs $13.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$163K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$13.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.1M$5.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.9M$140K$5.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$782K$2.3M$3.1M$9.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$163K$163K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT33.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.3M$2.5M$3.8M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.3M$2.5M$3.8M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.0M$2.1M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$82K$163K$163K$163K$163K$163K$163K
Cumulative$0$3.7M$7.3M$10.9M$13.4M$13.4M$13.4M$13.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $13.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.4x
9.0x42% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x
10.0x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x
11.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.9x44% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x
12.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.1x41% / 5.5x42% / 5.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.3x
Headroom (turns)
-5%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -5% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.8x, adding 1.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$54.9M$54.9M21.5%
Year 1$56.5M+$8.9M$65.4M25.7%
Year 2$58.2M+$13.4M$71.6M28.1%
Year 3$59.9M+$13.4M$73.4M28.8%
Year 4$61.7M+$13.4M$75.2M29.5%
Year 5$63.6M+$13.4M$77.0M30.2%
$548.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$847.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$298.5M
Value Created
$77.0M
Exit EBITDA
$87.4M
Organic Growth
$134.1M
RCM Value Creation
$77.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.5M$3.8M$5.1M$6.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.5M$3.8M$5.0M$6.1M
A/R Days Reduction$1.6M$2.3M$3.1M$3.7M
Clean Claim Rate$82K$122K$163K$196K
Total$6.7M$10.1M$13.4M$16.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 55 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin21.5%-5.7%7.3%16.1%
P93
Net-to-Gross21.3%21.2%26.7%33.7%
P25
Occupancy38.7%43.8%64.6%80.2%
P18
Rev/Bed$2.7M$436K$1.0M$1.9M
P93
Exp/Bed$2.1M$458K$1.0M$1.8M
P87

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML