Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SENTARA CAREPLEX HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SENTARA CAREPLEX HOSPITAL
CCN 490093 | VA | 169 beds | Current EBITDA $28.0M → Pro Forma $44.0M (+$15.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$302.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$28.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$15.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$44.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$15.9M
Modeled Uplift
$11.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $11.0M (vs $15.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$194K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$15.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.0M$6.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.8M$166K$6.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$928K$2.8M$3.7M$11.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$194K$194K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.2M$2.5M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$97K$194K$194K$194K$194K$194K$194K
Cumulative$0$4.3M$8.7M$12.9M$15.9M$15.9M$15.9M$15.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $15.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x56% / 9.4x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.9x69% / 13.6x
9.0x51% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.7x
10.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 8.0x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.2x
11.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 7.0x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
12.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x51% / 8.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.1x
Headroom (turns)
17%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 17% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.4x, adding 3.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$28.0M$28.0M9.3%
Year 1$28.9M+$10.6M$39.5M13.1%
Year 2$29.8M+$15.9M$45.7M15.1%
Year 3$30.6M+$15.9M$46.6M15.4%
Year 4$31.6M+$15.9M$47.5M15.7%
Year 5$32.5M+$15.9M$48.4M16.0%
$280.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$532.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$252.2M
Value Created
$48.4M
Exit EBITDA
$44.7M
Organic Growth
$159.1M
RCM Value Creation
$48.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$7.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$7.2M
A/R Days Reduction$1.8M$2.8M$3.7M$4.4M
Clean Claim Rate$97K$145K$194K$232K
Total$8.0M$11.9M$15.9M$19.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 48 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin9.3%-4.0%5.6%15.1%
P60
Net-to-Gross27.6%20.6%25.9%31.4%
P60
Occupancy58.2%52.2%68.4%79.0%
P35
Rev/Bed$1.8M$657K$1.6M$1.9M
P60
Exp/Bed$1.6M$679K$1.4M$1.8M
P65

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML