Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BEDFORD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 16:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BEDFORD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 490088 | VA | 33 beds | Current EBITDA $3.0M → Pro Forma $5.5M (+$2.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$47.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$2.5M
Modeled Uplift
$1.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$797K
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.7M (vs $2.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$957K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$947K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$582K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$31K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$957K$957K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$921K$26K$947K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$147K$435K$582K$1.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$31K$31K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT46.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$239K$478K$717K$957K$957K$957K$957K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$237K$474K$710K$947K$947K$947K$947K
A/R Days Reduction$0$194K$388K$582K$582K$582K$582K$582K
Clean Claim Rate$0$15K$31K$31K$31K$31K$31K$31K
Cumulative$0$685K$1.4M$2.0M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x63% / 11.4x67% / 13.0x71% / 14.6x73% / 15.4x75% / 16.3x
9.0x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.2x66% / 12.7x68% / 13.4x70% / 14.1x
10.0x53% / 8.5x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.7x65% / 12.4x
11.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x
12.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.9x
Headroom (turns)
29%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 29% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.6x, adding 3.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.0M$3.0M6.2%
Year 1$3.1M+$1.7M$4.8M9.9%
Year 2$3.2M+$2.5M$5.7M11.9%
Year 3$3.3M+$2.5M$5.8M12.1%
Year 4$3.4M+$2.5M$5.9M12.3%
Year 5$3.5M+$2.5M$6.0M12.5%
$29.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$65.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$35.9M
Value Created
$6.0M
Exit EBITDA
$4.8M
Organic Growth
$25.2M
RCM Value Creation
$6.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$478K$717K$957K$1.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$474K$710K$947K$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$291K$437K$582K$698K
Clean Claim Rate$15K$23K$31K$37K
Total$1.3M$1.9M$2.5M$3.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 38 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin6.2%-11.8%2.6%15.0%
P55
Net-to-Gross26.6%23.0%30.9%46.1%
P32
Occupancy49.7%41.3%52.7%74.6%
P45
Rev/Bed$1.4M$493K$780K$2.0M
P55
Exp/Bed$1.4M$450K$1.1M$2.0M
P55

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML