Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 06:38 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 490069 | VA | 243 beds | Current EBITDA $-11.6M → Pro Forma $8.9M (+$20.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$389.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-11.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$20.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$8.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$14.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$20.5M
Modeled Uplift
$15.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $15.0M (vs $20.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$249K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$20.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.8M$7.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.5M$214K$7.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.2M$3.5M$4.7M$14.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$249K$249K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.9M$3.9M$5.8M$7.8M$7.8M$7.8M$7.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.9M$3.9M$5.8M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$125K$249K$249K$249K$249K$249K$249K
Cumulative$0$5.6M$11.2M$16.6M$20.5M$20.5M$20.5M$20.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $20.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-10.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
17.4x
Headroom (turns)
268%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 268% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -10.9x, adding 109.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-11.6M$-11.6M-3.0%
Year 1$-11.9M+$13.7M$1.8M0.5%
Year 2$-12.3M+$20.5M$8.2M2.1%
Year 3$-12.6M+$20.5M$7.9M2.0%
Year 4$-13.0M+$20.5M$7.5M1.9%
Year 5$-13.4M+$20.5M$7.1M1.8%
$-115.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$78.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$193.6M
Value Created
$7.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-18.4M
Organic Growth
$204.9M
RCM Value Creation
$7.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.9M$5.8M$7.8M$9.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.9M$5.8M$7.7M$9.3M
A/R Days Reduction$2.4M$3.6M$4.7M$5.7M
Clean Claim Rate$125K$187K$249K$299K
Total$10.2M$15.4M$20.5M$24.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 33 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.0%-3.3%5.0%13.8%
P25
Net-to-Gross22.2%23.6%27.8%35.0%
P19
Occupancy82.0%60.5%72.3%82.0%
P73
Rev/Bed$1.6M$1.5M$1.8M$2.1M
P34
Exp/Bed$1.7M$1.3M$1.6M$2.0M
P58

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML