Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BON SECOURS SOUTHSIDE MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BON SECOURS SOUTHSIDE MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 490067 | VA | 300 beds | Current EBITDA $1.9M → Pro Forma $15.7M (+$13.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$262.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$13.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$15.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$10.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$13.8M
Modeled Uplift
$9.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.7M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $9.1M (vs $13.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$168K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$13.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.2M$5.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.0M$144K$5.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$805K$2.4M$3.2M$10.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$168K$168K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.9M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.9M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.1M$2.1M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$84K$168K$168K$168K$168K$168K$168K
Cumulative$0$3.8M$7.5M$11.2M$13.8M$13.8M$13.8M$13.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $13.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x125% / 57.6x130% / 64.3x135% / 71.1x137% / 74.5x139% / 77.9x
9.0x119% / 50.8x124% / 56.8x129% / 62.8x131% / 65.8x133% / 68.8x
10.0x115% / 45.4x119% / 50.8x124% / 56.2x126% / 58.9x128% / 61.6x
11.0x110% / 41.0x115% / 45.9x119% / 50.8x121% / 53.3x123% / 55.7x
12.0x106% / 37.3x111% / 41.8x115% / 46.3x117% / 48.6x119% / 50.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.5x
Headroom (turns)
84%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 84% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.0x, adding 7.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.9M$1.9M0.7%
Year 1$2.0M+$9.2M$11.2M4.3%
Year 2$2.0M+$13.8M$15.8M6.0%
Year 3$2.1M+$13.8M$15.9M6.1%
Year 4$2.2M+$13.8M$16.0M6.1%
Year 5$2.2M+$13.8M$16.0M6.1%
$19.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$176.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$157.1M
Value Created
$16.0M
Exit EBITDA
$3.1M
Organic Growth
$138.0M
RCM Value Creation
$16.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.6M$3.9M$5.2M$6.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.6M$3.9M$5.2M$6.2M
A/R Days Reduction$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.8M
Clean Claim Rate$84K$126K$168K$201K
Total$6.9M$10.3M$13.8M$16.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 27 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.7%-1.7%5.5%14.4%
P27
Net-to-Gross11.7%24.6%29.0%35.2%
P0
Occupancy54.1%60.7%73.5%81.3%
P7
Rev/Bed$874K$1.5M$1.8M$2.2M
P4
Exp/Bed$868K$1.4M$1.6M$2.0M
P4

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML