Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SENTARA VA. BEACH GENERAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 06:38 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SENTARA VA. BEACH GENERAL HOSPITAL
CCN 490057 | VA | 239 beds | Current EBITDA $67.7M → Pro Forma $91.0M (+$23.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$443.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$67.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$23.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$91.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$17.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$23.4M
Modeled Uplift
$17.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $17.1M (vs $23.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$284K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$23.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.9M$8.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.5M$244K$8.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.4M$4.0M$5.4M$17.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$284K$284K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.2M$4.4M$6.7M$8.9M$8.9M$8.9M$8.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.2M$4.4M$6.6M$8.8M$8.8M$8.8M$8.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$142K$284K$284K$284K$284K$284K$284K
Cumulative$0$6.4M$12.7M$18.9M$23.4M$23.4M$23.4M$23.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $23.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.0x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x
9.0x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x
10.0x41% / 5.5x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x
11.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x
12.0x33% / 4.1x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.2x
Headroom (turns)
3%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 3% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.3x, adding 2.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$67.7M$67.7M15.2%
Year 1$69.7M+$15.6M$85.3M19.2%
Year 2$71.8M+$23.4M$95.2M21.4%
Year 3$74.0M+$23.4M$97.3M21.9%
Year 4$76.2M+$23.4M$99.5M22.4%
Year 5$78.5M+$23.4M$101.8M22.9%
$676.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.12B
Exit EV (11x)
$443.1M
Value Created
$101.8M
Exit EBITDA
$107.8M
Organic Growth
$233.5M
RCM Value Creation
$101.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.4M$6.7M$8.9M$10.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.4M$6.6M$8.8M$10.5M
A/R Days Reduction$2.7M$4.1M$5.4M$6.5M
Clean Claim Rate$142K$213K$284K$341K
Total$11.7M$17.5M$23.4M$28.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 33 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin15.2%-3.3%5.0%13.8%
P81
Net-to-Gross26.3%23.6%27.8%35.0%
P38
Occupancy80.5%60.5%72.3%82.0%
P70
Rev/Bed$1.9M$1.5M$1.8M$2.1M
P50
Exp/Bed$1.6M$1.3M$1.6M$2.0M
P39

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML