Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SENTARA OBICI HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SENTARA OBICI HOSPITAL
CCN 490044 | VA | 186 beds | Current EBITDA $49.8M → Pro Forma $67.1M (+$17.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$329.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$49.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$17.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$67.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$12.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$17.3M
Modeled Uplift
$12.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $12.5M (vs $17.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$211K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$17.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.6M$6.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.3M$181K$6.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.0M$3.0M$4.0M$12.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$211K$211K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.6M$3.3M$4.9M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.6M$3.3M$4.9M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.3M$2.7M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$105K$211K$211K$211K$211K$211K$211K
Cumulative$0$4.7M$9.4M$14.0M$17.3M$17.3M$17.3M$17.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $17.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.0x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x
9.0x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x
10.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x
11.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.5x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x
12.0x33% / 4.1x38% / 4.9x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.2x
Headroom (turns)
3%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 3% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.3x, adding 2.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$49.8M$49.8M15.1%
Year 1$51.3M+$11.5M$62.8M19.1%
Year 2$52.8M+$17.3M$70.1M21.3%
Year 3$54.4M+$17.3M$71.7M21.8%
Year 4$56.0M+$17.3M$73.4M22.3%
Year 5$57.7M+$17.3M$75.0M22.8%
$497.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$825.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$327.5M
Value Created
$75.0M
Exit EBITDA
$79.3M
Organic Growth
$173.1M
RCM Value Creation
$75.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.3M$4.9M$6.6M$7.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.3M$4.9M$6.5M$7.8M
A/R Days Reduction$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$4.8M
Clean Claim Rate$105K$158K$211K$253K
Total$8.7M$13.0M$17.3M$20.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 46 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin15.1%-3.7%5.6%15.0%
P74
Net-to-Gross26.7%21.4%26.3%31.4%
P52
Occupancy73.5%54.2%71.6%80.0%
P52
Rev/Bed$1.8M$832K$1.6M$1.9M
P54
Exp/Bed$1.5M$755K$1.5M$1.8M
P48

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML