Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MARY IMMACULATE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 10:37 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MARY IMMACULATE HOSPITAL
CCN 490041 | VA | 114 beds | Current EBITDA $1.6M → Pro Forma $11.3M (+$9.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$184.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$9.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$11.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$7.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$9.7M
Modeled Uplift
$6.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.1M
Execution Discount
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Risk-adjusted uplift: $6.6M (vs $9.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$118K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$9.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.7M$3.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.6M$102K$3.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$566K$1.7M$2.2M$7.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$118K$118K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$923K$1.8M$2.8M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$914K$1.8M$2.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$749K$1.5M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$59K$118K$118K$118K$118K$118K$118K
Cumulative$0$2.6M$5.3M$7.9M$9.7M$9.7M$9.7M$9.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $9.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x119% / 50.7x124% / 56.7x129% / 62.7x131% / 65.7x133% / 68.7x
9.0x114% / 44.7x119% / 50.0x123% / 55.4x125% / 58.0x127% / 60.7x
10.0x109% / 39.9x114% / 44.7x118% / 49.5x120% / 51.9x122% / 54.3x
11.0x105% / 36.0x109% / 40.3x114% / 44.7x116% / 46.9x118% / 49.0x
12.0x101% / 32.7x106% / 36.7x110% / 40.7x112% / 42.7x114% / 44.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.3x
Headroom (turns)
82%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 82% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.2x, adding 7.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.6M$1.6M0.8%
Year 1$1.6M+$6.5M$8.1M4.4%
Year 2$1.7M+$9.7M$11.4M6.2%
Year 3$1.7M+$9.7M$11.4M6.2%
Year 4$1.8M+$9.7M$11.5M6.2%
Year 5$1.8M+$9.7M$11.5M6.2%
$15.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$126.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$111.1M
Value Created
$11.5M
Exit EBITDA
$2.5M
Organic Growth
$97.1M
RCM Value Creation
$11.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.8M$2.8M$3.7M$4.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.8M$2.7M$3.7M$4.4M
A/R Days Reduction$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.7M
Clean Claim Rate$59K$89K$118K$142K
Total$4.9M$7.3M$9.7M$11.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 53 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.8%-7.4%5.7%15.1%
P43
Net-to-Gross24.4%20.4%26.7%32.4%
P43
Occupancy53.9%45.6%64.6%78.3%
P32
Rev/Bed$1.6M$426K$1.2M$1.9M
P58
Exp/Bed$1.6M$462K$1.1M$1.8M
P66

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML