Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SHORE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 15:51 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SHORE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 490037 | VA | 52 beds | Current EBITDA $11.7M → Pro Forma $17.2M (+$5.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$103.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$11.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$17.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$5.4M
Modeled Uplift
$3.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.6M (vs $5.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$66K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.1M$2.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.0M$57K$2.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$316K$938K$1.3M$4.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$66K$66K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$516K$1.0M$1.5M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$510K$1.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$418K$836K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$33K$66K$66K$66K$66K$66K$66K
Cumulative$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x
9.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.5x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x
10.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x
11.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.2x
12.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.7x
Headroom (turns)
11%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 11% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.8x, adding 2.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$11.7M$11.7M11.4%
Year 1$12.1M+$3.6M$15.7M15.2%
Year 2$12.4M+$5.4M$17.9M17.3%
Year 3$12.8M+$5.4M$18.2M17.7%
Year 4$13.2M+$5.4M$18.6M18.1%
Year 5$13.6M+$5.4M$19.0M18.4%
$117.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$209.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$91.9M
Value Created
$19.0M
Exit EBITDA
$18.7M
Organic Growth
$54.2M
RCM Value Creation
$19.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.0M$1.5M$2.1M$2.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M
A/R Days Reduction$627K$941K$1.3M$1.5M
Clean Claim Rate$33K$49K$66K$79K
Total$2.7M$4.1M$5.4M$6.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 46 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin11.4%-9.5%6.8%15.5%
P61
Net-to-Gross30.4%21.3%28.5%38.7%
P59
Occupancy40.0%40.1%54.7%75.0%
P24
Rev/Bed$2.0M$393K$665K$1.8M
P78
Exp/Bed$1.8M$425K$729K$1.7M
P76

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML