Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — RUSSELL COUNTY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — RUSSELL COUNTY HOSPITAL
CCN 490002 | VA | 48 beds | Current EBITDA $7.3M → Pro Forma $9.2M (+$1.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$36.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$7.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$1.9M
Modeled Uplift
$1.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$663K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.3M (vs $1.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$729K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$722K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$444K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$23K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$729K$729K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$702K$20K$722K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$112K$332K$444K$1.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$23K$23K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT40.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$182K$365K$547K$729K$729K$729K$729K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$180K$361K$541K$722K$722K$722K$722K
A/R Days Reduction$0$148K$296K$444K$444K$444K$444K$444K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$23K$23K$23K$23K$23K$23K
Cumulative$0$522K$1.0M$1.6M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x60% / 10.6x
9.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x55% / 9.1x
10.0x38% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.8x
11.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x
12.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.5x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.2x
Headroom (turns)
-3%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -3% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.7x, adding 1.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$7.3M$7.3M19.9%
Year 1$7.5M+$1.3M$8.8M24.0%
Year 2$7.7M+$1.9M$9.6M26.4%
Year 3$7.9M+$1.9M$9.9M27.1%
Year 4$8.2M+$1.9M$10.1M27.7%
Year 5$8.4M+$1.9M$10.3M28.4%
$72.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$113.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$41.1M
Value Created
$10.3M
Exit EBITDA
$11.6M
Organic Growth
$19.2M
RCM Value Creation
$10.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$365K$547K$729K$875K
Denial Rate Reductio$361K$541K$722K$866K
A/R Days Reduction$222K$333K$444K$532K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$17K$23K$28K
Total$959K$1.4M$1.9M$2.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 48 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin19.9%-10.6%6.0%14.9%
P90
Net-to-Gross26.6%21.2%29.5%40.2%
P40
Occupancy44.3%40.2%52.7%76.3%
P27
Rev/Bed$759K$464K$714K$2.0M
P50
Exp/Bed$608K$453K$998K$1.9M
P38

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML