Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 09:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 463025 | UT | 84 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.1M → Pro Forma $-86K (+$1.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$19.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-86K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$742K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$1.0M
Modeled Uplift
$650K
Risk-Adjusted
-$368K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$387K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$383K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$235K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$12K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$387K$387K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$373K$11K$383K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$59K$176K$235K$742K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$12K$12K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT45.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$97K$194K$290K$387K$387K$387K$387K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$96K$192K$287K$383K$383K$383K$383K
A/R Days Reduction$0$78K$157K$235K$235K$235K$235K$235K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K
Cumulative$0$277K$554K$826K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.1M$-1.1M-5.7%
Year 1$-1.1M+$679K$-458K-2.4%
Year 2$-1.2M+$1.0M$-153K-0.8%
Year 3$-1.2M+$1.0M$-188K-1.0%
Year 4$-1.2M+$1.0M$-224K-1.2%
Year 5$-1.3M+$1.0M$-262K-1.4%
$-11.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$-2.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$8.2M
Value Created
$-262K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.8M
Organic Growth
$10.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-262K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$194K$290K$387K$464K
Denial Rate Reductio$192K$287K$383K$460K
A/R Days Reduction$118K$177K$235K$283K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$12K$15K
Total$509K$764K$1.0M$1.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 15 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-5.7%-3.1%20.6%30.4%
P20
Net-to-Gross57.0%29.6%42.4%45.2%
P93
Occupancy41.7%40.6%46.1%56.5%
P27
Rev/Bed$230K$401K$1.3M$2.3M
P13
Exp/Bed$244K$337K$823K$1.8M
P20

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML