Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SAN JUAN HEALTH SERVICES DISTRICT 2026-04-26 05:25 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SAN JUAN HEALTH SERVICES DISTRICT
CCN 461308 | UT | 21 beds | Current EBITDA $-2.5M → Pro Forma $-1.5M (+$1.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$19.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-2.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-1.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$740K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

58%
Realization (C)
$1.0M
Modeled Uplift
$590K
Risk-Adjusted
-$425K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like

Expected realization: 58% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$386K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$382K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$235K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$12K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$386K$386K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$372K$11K$382K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$59K$176K$235K$740K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$12K$12K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT62.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$97K$193K$290K$386K$386K$386K$386K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$96K$191K$287K$382K$382K$382K$382K
A/R Days Reduction$0$78K$157K$235K$235K$235K$235K$235K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K
Cumulative$0$277K$553K$823K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-2.5M$-2.5M-12.9%
Year 1$-2.6M+$677K$-1.9M-9.8%
Year 2$-2.6M+$1.0M$-1.6M-8.5%
Year 3$-2.7M+$1.0M$-1.7M-8.9%
Year 4$-2.8M+$1.0M$-1.8M-9.3%
Year 5$-2.9M+$1.0M$-1.9M-9.7%
$-24.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$-20.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$4.3M
Value Created
$-1.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-4.0M
Organic Growth
$10.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-1.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$193K$290K$386K$463K
Denial Rate Reductio$191K$287K$382K$459K
A/R Days Reduction$117K$176K$235K$282K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$12K$15K
Total$508K$762K$1.0M$1.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 30 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-12.9%-7.6%4.5%11.4%
P13
Net-to-Gross69.6%40.0%49.7%62.9%
P80
Occupancy9.7%21.0%29.6%39.3%
P3
Rev/Bed$919K$612K$1.6M$2.6M
P30
Exp/Bed$1.0M$779K$1.5M$2.3M
P37

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML