Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SPANISH FORK HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SPANISH FORK HOSPITAL
CCN 460062 | UT | 16 beds | Current EBITDA $297K → Pro Forma $3.7M (+$3.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$65.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$297K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$3.4M
Modeled Uplift
$2.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$853K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.6M (vs $3.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$795K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$42K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.3M$1.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.3M$36K$1.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$200K$594K$795K$2.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$42K$42K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT69.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$327K$653K$980K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$323K$647K$970K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$265K$530K$795K$795K$795K$795K$795K
Clean Claim Rate$0$21K$42K$42K$42K$42K$42K$42K
Cumulative$0$936K$1.9M$2.8M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x146% / 89.7x151% / 100.1x156% / 110.4x159% / 115.6x161% / 120.7x
9.0x140% / 79.4x145% / 88.6x150% / 97.8x152% / 102.4x155% / 107.0x
10.0x135% / 71.1x140% / 79.4x145% / 87.7x147% / 91.8x149% / 95.9x
11.0x130% / 64.4x135% / 71.9x140% / 79.4x142% / 83.2x144% / 86.9x
12.0x126% / 58.7x131% / 65.6x136% / 72.5x138% / 76.0x140% / 79.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.8x
Headroom (turns)
90%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 90% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.7x, adding 7.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$297K$297K0.5%
Year 1$306K+$2.3M$2.6M4.0%
Year 2$316K+$3.4M$3.8M5.7%
Year 3$325K+$3.4M$3.8M5.8%
Year 4$335K+$3.4M$3.8M5.8%
Year 5$345K+$3.4M$3.8M5.8%
$3.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$41.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$38.6M
Value Created
$3.8M
Exit EBITDA
$474K
Organic Growth
$34.4M
RCM Value Creation
$3.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$653K$980K$1.3M$1.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$647K$970K$1.3M$1.6M
A/R Days Reduction$397K$596K$795K$954K
Clean Claim Rate$21K$31K$42K$50K
Total$1.7M$2.6M$3.4M$4.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 19 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.5%-10.3%-1.4%5.1%
P53
Net-to-Gross37.0%46.6%57.7%69.9%
P11
Occupancy69.7%19.4%27.5%37.6%
P84
Rev/Bed$4.1M$689K$1.4M$2.4M
P89
Exp/Bed$4.1M$851K$1.4M$2.2M
P89

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML