Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LONE PEAK HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LONE PEAK HOSPITAL
CCN 460060 | UT | 61 beds | Current EBITDA $33.6M → Pro Forma $40.6M (+$7.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$133.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$33.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$7.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$40.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$7.0M
Modeled Uplift
$4.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.2M
Execution Discount
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Payer Diversity. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.8M (vs $7.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$85K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$7.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.7M$2.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.6M$73K$2.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$409K$1.2M$1.6M$5.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$85K$85K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT46.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$666K$1.3M$2.0M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$659K$1.3M$2.0M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$540K$1.1M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$43K$85K$85K$85K$85K$85K$85K
Cumulative$0$1.9M$3.8M$5.7M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $7.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x
9.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
10.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x
11.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.5x
12.0x28% / 3.4x33% / 4.2x37% / 4.9x39% / 5.3x41% / 5.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.5x
Headroom (turns)
-8%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -8% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.0x, adding 1.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$33.6M$33.6M25.2%
Year 1$34.6M+$4.7M$39.3M29.5%
Year 2$35.6M+$7.0M$42.7M32.0%
Year 3$36.7M+$7.0M$43.7M32.8%
Year 4$37.8M+$7.0M$44.8M33.7%
Year 5$39.0M+$7.0M$46.0M34.5%
$336.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$505.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$169.5M
Value Created
$46.0M
Exit EBITDA
$53.5M
Organic Growth
$70.0M
RCM Value Creation
$46.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.3M$2.0M$2.7M$3.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.3M$2.0M$2.6M$3.2M
A/R Days Reduction$810K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
Clean Claim Rate$43K$64K$85K$102K
Total$3.5M$5.3M$7.0M$8.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 26 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin25.2%0.0%14.7%28.3%
P65
Net-to-Gross23.0%35.9%42.1%46.1%
P4
Occupancy50.0%30.0%42.4%56.7%
P62
Rev/Bed$2.2M$465K$1.5M$2.4M
P58
Exp/Bed$1.6M$402K$1.1M$1.9M
P54

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML