Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — THE ORTHOPEDIC SPECIALTY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — THE ORTHOPEDIC SPECIALTY HOSPITAL
CCN 460049 | UT | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $11.0M → Pro Forma $15.6M (+$4.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$88.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$11.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$15.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

59%
Realization (C)
$4.7M
Modeled Uplift
$2.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 59% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.7M (vs $4.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$57K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.8M$1.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.7M$49K$1.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$272K$808K$1.1M$3.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$57K$57K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT65.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$444K$887K$1.3M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$439K$879K$1.3M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$360K$720K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$28K$57K$57K$57K$57K$57K$57K
Cumulative$0$1.3M$2.5M$3.8M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.6x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.2x
9.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x
10.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x
11.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x
12.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.6x
Headroom (turns)
9%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 9% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.9x, adding 2.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$11.0M$11.0M12.4%
Year 1$11.3M+$3.1M$14.4M16.2%
Year 2$11.6M+$4.7M$16.3M18.4%
Year 3$12.0M+$4.7M$16.7M18.8%
Year 4$12.4M+$4.7M$17.0M19.2%
Year 5$12.7M+$4.7M$17.4M19.6%
$109.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$191.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$81.6M
Value Created
$17.4M
Exit EBITDA
$17.5M
Organic Growth
$46.7M
RCM Value Creation
$17.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$887K$1.3M$1.8M$2.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$879K$1.3M$1.8M$2.1M
A/R Days Reduction$540K$810K$1.1M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$28K$43K$57K$68K
Total$2.3M$3.5M$4.7M$5.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 26 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin12.4%-11.5%4.6%15.3%
P62
Net-to-Gross42.6%38.3%44.2%65.4%
P42
Occupancy4.6%26.4%34.8%56.9%
P0
Rev/Bed$2.2M$465K$1.5M$2.4M
P62
Exp/Bed$1.9M$620K$1.4M$2.0M
P65

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML