Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ALTA VIEW HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ALTA VIEW HOSPITAL
CCN 460044 | UT | 57 beds | Current EBITDA $-755K → Pro Forma $6.1M (+$6.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$130.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-755K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$6.9M
Modeled Uplift
$4.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.7M (vs $6.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$84K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.6M$2.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.5M$72K$2.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$402K$1.2M$1.6M$5.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$84K$84K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT45.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$655K$1.3M$2.0M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$648K$1.3M$1.9M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$531K$1.1M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$42K$84K$84K$84K$84K$84K$84K
Cumulative$0$1.9M$3.8M$5.6M$6.9M$6.9M$6.9M$6.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-1.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
7.5x
Headroom (turns)
116%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 116% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -1.0x, adding 100.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-755K$-755K-0.6%
Year 1$-778K+$4.6M$3.8M2.9%
Year 2$-801K+$6.9M$6.1M4.6%
Year 3$-825K+$6.9M$6.1M4.6%
Year 4$-850K+$6.9M$6.0M4.6%
Year 5$-875K+$6.9M$6.0M4.6%
$-7.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$66.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$73.7M
Value Created
$6.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-1.2M
Organic Growth
$68.9M
RCM Value Creation
$6.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.3M$2.0M$2.6M$3.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.3M$1.9M$2.6M$3.1M
A/R Days Reduction$797K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
Clean Claim Rate$42K$63K$84K$101K
Total$3.4M$5.2M$6.9M$8.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 23 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-0.6%-3.1%13.7%25.3%
P26
Net-to-Gross38.0%37.6%42.4%45.8%
P30
Occupancy46.1%30.1%41.7%57.0%
P57
Rev/Bed$2.3M$490K$2.2M$2.6M
P65
Exp/Bed$2.3M$506K$1.6M$1.9M
P83

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML