Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — AMEND #1 LAKEVIEW HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — AMEND #1 LAKEVIEW HOSPITAL
CCN 460042 | UT | 84 beds | Current EBITDA $37.0M → Pro Forma $42.9M (+$5.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$111.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$37.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$42.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$5.9M
Modeled Uplift
$3.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.8M (vs $5.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$71K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.2M$2.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.1M$61K$2.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$342K$1.0M$1.4M$4.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$71K$71K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT45.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$557K$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$552K$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$452K$904K$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$36K$71K$71K$71K$71K$71K$71K
Cumulative$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.8M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.5x54% / 8.5x55% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x
9.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.3x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x
10.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x
11.0x30% / 3.8x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x
12.0x26% / 3.2x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.6x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.8x
Headroom (turns)
-12%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -12% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.3x, adding 1.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$37.0M$37.0M33.2%
Year 1$38.2M+$3.9M$42.1M37.7%
Year 2$39.3M+$5.9M$45.2M40.5%
Year 3$40.5M+$5.9M$46.3M41.6%
Year 4$41.7M+$5.9M$47.6M42.7%
Year 5$42.9M+$5.9M$48.8M43.8%
$370.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$536.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$166.5M
Value Created
$48.8M
Exit EBITDA
$59.0M
Organic Growth
$58.7M
RCM Value Creation
$48.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.6M
A/R Days Reduction$678K$1.0M$1.4M$1.6M
Clean Claim Rate$36K$54K$71K$86K
Total$2.9M$4.4M$5.9M$7.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 15 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin33.2%-3.1%20.6%30.4%
P80
Net-to-Gross20.2%29.6%42.4%45.2%
P0
Occupancy39.5%40.6%46.1%56.5%
P20
Rev/Bed$1.3M$401K$1.3M$2.3M
P47
Exp/Bed$886K$337K$823K$1.8M
P53

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML