Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BRIGHAM CITY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BRIGHAM CITY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
CCN 460017 | UT | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $14.0M → Pro Forma $16.3M (+$2.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$44.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$14.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$16.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$2.4M
Modeled Uplift
$1.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$933K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.4M (vs $2.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$897K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$888K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$546K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$29K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$897K$897K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$864K$25K$888K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$138K$408K$546K$1.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$29K$29K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT65.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$224K$449K$673K$897K$897K$897K$897K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$222K$444K$666K$888K$888K$888K$888K
A/R Days Reduction$0$182K$364K$546K$546K$546K$546K$546K
Clean Claim Rate$0$14K$29K$29K$29K$29K$29K$29K
Cumulative$0$643K$1.3M$1.9M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x
9.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x
10.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x
11.0x31% / 3.8x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x
12.0x26% / 3.2x32% / 4.0x36% / 4.7x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.7x
Headroom (turns)
-11%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -11% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.2x, adding 1.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$14.0M$14.0M31.1%
Year 1$14.4M+$1.6M$15.9M35.5%
Year 2$14.8M+$2.4M$17.2M38.3%
Year 3$15.3M+$2.4M$17.6M39.3%
Year 4$15.7M+$2.4M$18.1M40.3%
Year 5$16.2M+$2.4M$18.5M41.3%
$139.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$203.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$64.4M
Value Created
$18.5M
Exit EBITDA
$22.2M
Organic Growth
$23.6M
RCM Value Creation
$18.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$449K$673K$897K$1.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$444K$666K$888K$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$273K$409K$546K$655K
Clean Claim Rate$14K$22K$29K$34K
Total$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 26 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin31.1%-11.5%4.6%15.3%
P88
Net-to-Gross23.9%38.3%44.2%65.4%
P8
Occupancy17.6%26.4%34.8%56.9%
P12
Rev/Bed$1.1M$465K$1.5M$2.4M
P38
Exp/Bed$773K$620K$1.4M$2.0M
P31

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML