Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MOUNTAIN WEST MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 05:24 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MOUNTAIN WEST MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 460014 | UT | 36 beds | Current EBITDA $37.0M → Pro Forma $42.0M (+$5.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$96.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$37.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$42.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$5.1M
Modeled Uplift
$3.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.3M (vs $5.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$61K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.9M$1.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.8M$53K$1.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$295K$874K$1.2M$3.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$61K$61K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT64.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$480K$961K$1.4M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$476K$951K$1.4M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$390K$779K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$31K$61K$61K$61K$61K$61K$61K
Cumulative$0$1.4M$2.8M$4.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.9x56% / 9.4x
9.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x
10.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.9x
11.0x30% / 3.6x35% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x43% / 5.9x
12.0x25% / 3.1x30% / 3.8x35% / 4.5x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.9x
Headroom (turns)
-15%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -15% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.4x, adding 1.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$37.0M$37.0M38.5%
Year 1$38.1M+$3.4M$41.4M43.1%
Year 2$39.2M+$5.1M$44.3M46.1%
Year 3$40.4M+$5.1M$45.4M47.3%
Year 4$41.6M+$5.1M$46.6M48.6%
Year 5$42.8M+$5.1M$47.9M49.9%
$369.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$526.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$157.3M
Value Created
$47.9M
Exit EBITDA
$58.9M
Organic Growth
$50.5M
RCM Value Creation
$47.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$961K$1.4M$1.9M$2.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$951K$1.4M$1.9M$2.3M
A/R Days Reduction$584K$877K$1.2M$1.4M
Clean Claim Rate$31K$46K$61K$74K
Total$2.5M$3.8M$5.1M$6.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 28 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin38.5%-12.6%4.6%13.9%
P96
Net-to-Gross39.4%39.0%45.7%64.8%
P25
Occupancy36.6%24.3%30.1%51.5%
P57
Rev/Bed$2.7M$531K$1.5M$2.5M
P75
Exp/Bed$1.6M$620K$1.4M$2.1M
P57

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML