Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UTAH VALLEY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:57 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UTAH VALLEY HOSPITAL
CCN 460001 | UT | 338 beds | Current EBITDA $54.0M → Pro Forma $91.2M (+$37.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$707.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$54.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$37.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$91.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$27.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$37.2M
Modeled Uplift
$25.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$11.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $25.7M (vs $37.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$14.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$14.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$8.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$453K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$37.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$14.1M$14.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$13.6M$389K$14.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.2M$6.4M$8.6M$27.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$453K$453K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT40.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.5M$7.1M$10.6M$14.1M$14.1M$14.1M$14.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.5M$7.0M$10.5M$14.0M$14.0M$14.0M$14.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.9M$5.7M$8.6M$8.6M$8.6M$8.6M$8.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$226K$453K$453K$453K$453K$453K$453K
Cumulative$0$10.1M$20.3M$30.2M$37.2M$37.2M$37.2M$37.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $37.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.3x64% / 11.8x68% / 13.3x70% / 14.0x71% / 14.8x
9.0x54% / 8.8x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.4x65% / 12.1x66% / 12.8x
10.0x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.8x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x
11.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x
12.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x54% / 8.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.5x
Headroom (turns)
23%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 23% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.0x, adding 3.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$54.0M$54.0M7.6%
Year 1$55.6M+$24.8M$80.4M11.4%
Year 2$57.3M+$37.2M$94.5M13.4%
Year 3$59.0M+$37.2M$96.2M13.6%
Year 4$60.8M+$37.2M$98.0M13.9%
Year 5$62.6M+$37.2M$99.8M14.1%
$539.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.10B
Exit EV (11x)
$557.8M
Value Created
$99.8M
Exit EBITDA
$86.0M
Organic Growth
$372.1M
RCM Value Creation
$99.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$7.1M$10.6M$14.1M$17.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$7.0M$10.5M$14.0M$16.8M
A/R Days Reduction$4.3M$6.5M$8.6M$10.3M
Clean Claim Rate$226K$339K$453K$543K
Total$18.6M$27.9M$37.2M$44.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 12 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.6%6.6%12.0%23.2%
P27
Net-to-Gross38.6%34.6%37.1%40.3%
P55
Occupancy66.5%50.7%65.6%74.7%
P50
Rev/Bed$2.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.9M
P45
Exp/Bed$1.9M$940K$1.7M$2.4M
P50

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML