Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — OCEANS BEHAVIORAL HOSPITAL PASADENA 2026-04-26 17:20 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — OCEANS BEHAVIORAL HOSPITAL PASADENA
CCN 454147 | TX | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $17K → Pro Forma $382K (+$365K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$6.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$17K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$365K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$382K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+541bps
Margin Improvement
$259K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$365K
Modeled Uplift
$235K
Risk-Adjusted
-$130K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$138K
+205bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$135K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$82K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+14bp
Total EBITDA Impact$365K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$130K$8K$138K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$135K$135K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$21K$61K$82K$259K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$35K$69K$104K$138K$138K$138K$138K
Cost to Collect$0$34K$67K$101K$135K$135K$135K$135K
A/R Days Reduction$0$27K$55K$82K$82K$82K$82K$82K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$100K$201K$297K$365K$365K$365K$365K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $365K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x177% / 164.1x183% / 182.7x189% / 201.3x192% / 210.6x194% / 219.9x
9.0x171% / 145.5x177% / 162.1x182% / 178.6x185% / 186.9x187% / 195.1x
10.0x165% / 130.7x171% / 145.5x176% / 160.4x179% / 167.8x181% / 175.3x
11.0x160% / 118.5x166% / 132.0x171% / 145.5x173% / 152.3x176% / 159.1x
12.0x155% / 108.3x161% / 120.7x166% / 133.1x168% / 139.3x171% / 145.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
6.1x
Headroom (turns)
94%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 94% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.4x, adding 8.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$17K$17K0.2%
Year 1$17K+$243K$261K3.9%
Year 2$18K+$365K$383K5.7%
Year 3$18K+$365K$383K5.7%
Year 4$19K+$365K$384K5.7%
Year 5$19K+$365K$384K5.7%
$168K
Entry EV (10x)
$4.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$4.1M
Value Created
$384K
Exit EBITDA
$27K
Organic Growth
$3.6M
RCM Value Creation
$384K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$69K$104K$138K$166K
Cost to Collect$67K$101K$135K$162K
A/R Days Reduction$41K$62K$82K$99K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$182K$274K$365K$438K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 287 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.2%-23.7%-2.9%10.4%
P55
Net-to-Gross48.3%24.4%34.4%51.0%
P70
Occupancy45.4%19.3%44.2%69.4%
P52
Rev/Bed$169K$371K$584K$1.2M
P6
Exp/Bed$168K$402K$631K$1.3M
P3

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML