Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — RIO VISTA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH 2026-04-26 11:15 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — RIO VISTA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
CCN 454146 | TX | 92 beds | Current EBITDA $7.8M → Pro Forma $9.3M (+$1.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$27.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$7.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$1.5M
Modeled Uplift
$1.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$417K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Commercial Payer %, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$554K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$549K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$337K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$18K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$554K$554K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$534K$15K$549K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$85K$252K$337K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$18K$18K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT39.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$139K$277K$416K$554K$554K$554K$554K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$137K$274K$412K$549K$549K$549K$549K
A/R Days Reduction$0$112K$225K$337K$337K$337K$337K$337K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K
Cumulative$0$397K$794K$1.2M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x
9.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x49% / 7.5x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x
10.0x36% / 4.6x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x
11.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x44% / 6.3x
12.0x27% / 3.3x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.1x41% / 5.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.6x
Headroom (turns)
-10%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -10% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.1x, adding 1.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$7.8M$7.8M28.2%
Year 1$8.0M+$972K$9.0M32.5%
Year 2$8.3M+$1.5M$9.7M35.1%
Year 3$8.5M+$1.5M$10.0M36.0%
Year 4$8.8M+$1.5M$10.2M37.0%
Year 5$9.0M+$1.5M$10.5M37.9%
$78.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$115.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$37.5M
Value Created
$10.5M
Exit EBITDA
$12.4M
Organic Growth
$14.6M
RCM Value Creation
$10.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$277K$416K$554K$665K
Denial Rate Reductio$274K$412K$549K$659K
A/R Days Reduction$169K$253K$337K$405K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$13K$18K$21K
Total$729K$1.1M$1.5M$1.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 199 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin28.2%-10.7%2.7%11.7%
P95
Net-to-Gross39.3%16.6%27.2%39.1%
P75
Occupancy79.0%44.0%58.5%75.4%
P80
Rev/Bed$301K$286K$574K$1.2M
P27
Exp/Bed$216K$300K$506K$1.2M
P13

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML