Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WOODLAND SPRINGS 2026-04-26 10:11 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WOODLAND SPRINGS
CCN 454144 | TX | 96 beds | Current EBITDA $-3.2M → Pro Forma $-2.2M (+$1.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$19.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-3.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-2.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$746K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$1.0M
Modeled Uplift
$707K
Risk-Adjusted
-$316K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$389K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$385K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$237K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$12K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$389K$389K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$374K$11K$385K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$60K$177K$237K$746K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$12K$12K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT39.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$97K$195K$292K$389K$389K$389K$389K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$96K$193K$289K$385K$385K$385K$385K
A/R Days Reduction$0$79K$158K$237K$237K$237K$237K$237K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K
Cumulative$0$279K$557K$830K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-3.2M$-3.2M-16.4%
Year 1$-3.3M+$682K$-2.6M-13.4%
Year 2$-3.4M+$1.0M$-2.4M-12.2%
Year 3$-3.5M+$1.0M$-2.5M-12.7%
Year 4$-3.6M+$1.0M$-2.6M-13.2%
Year 5$-3.7M+$1.0M$-2.7M-13.8%
$-32.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$-29.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$2.5M
Value Created
$-2.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-5.1M
Organic Growth
$10.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-2.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$195K$292K$389K$467K
Denial Rate Reductio$193K$289K$385K$462K
A/R Days Reduction$118K$178K$237K$284K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$12K$15K
Total$512K$768K$1.0M$1.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 197 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-16.4%-10.5%2.7%12.1%
P18
Net-to-Gross26.8%16.4%26.9%39.3%
P49
Occupancy67.3%44.4%59.7%75.6%
P61
Rev/Bed$203K$284K$560K$1.2M
P11
Exp/Bed$236K$297K$505K$1.2M
P18

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML