Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PALMS BEHAVIORAL HEALTH 2026-04-26 17:19 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PALMS BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
CCN 454141 | TX | 94 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.3M → Pro Forma $-555K (+$697K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$13.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$697K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-555K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+528bps
Margin Improvement
$507K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$697K
Modeled Uplift
$457K
Risk-Adjusted
-$241K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$264K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$263K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$161K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$697K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$264K$264K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$254K$8K$263K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$41K$120K$161K$507K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$66K$132K$198K$264K$264K$264K$264K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$66K$131K$197K$263K$263K$263K$263K
A/R Days Reduction$0$54K$107K$161K$161K$161K$161K$161K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$190K$380K$566K$697K$697K$697K$697K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $697K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.3M$-1.3M-9.5%
Year 1$-1.3M+$465K$-825K-6.2%
Year 2$-1.3M+$697K$-631K-4.8%
Year 3$-1.4M+$697K$-671K-5.1%
Year 4$-1.4M+$697K$-712K-5.4%
Year 5$-1.5M+$697K$-754K-5.7%
$-12.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$-8.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$4.2M
Value Created
$-754K
Exit EBITDA
$-2.0M
Organic Growth
$7.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-754K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$132K$198K$264K$317K
Denial Rate Reductio$131K$197K$263K$315K
A/R Days Reduction$80K$121K$161K$193K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$349K$523K$697K$837K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 200 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-9.5%-10.6%2.6%11.9%
P27
Net-to-Gross27.8%16.4%27.0%38.9%
P53
Occupancy50.8%44.1%58.5%75.3%
P36
Rev/Bed$141K$286K$573K$1.2M
P4
Exp/Bed$154K$302K$507K$1.2M
P2

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML