Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HAVEN BEHAVIORAL HOSPITAL OF FRISCO 2026-04-26 12:30 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HAVEN BEHAVIORAL HOSPITAL OF FRISCO
CCN 454134 | TX | 70 beds | Current EBITDA $-3.1M → Pro Forma $-2.4M (+$716K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$13.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-3.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$716K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-2.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+527bps
Margin Improvement
$521K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$716K
Modeled Uplift
$511K
Risk-Adjusted
-$205K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$272K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$270K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$165K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$716K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$272K$272K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$262K$8K$270K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$42K$124K$165K$521K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$68K$136K$204K$272K$272K$272K$272K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$67K$135K$202K$270K$270K$270K$270K
A/R Days Reduction$0$55K$110K$165K$165K$165K$165K$165K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$195K$391K$581K$716K$716K$716K$716K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $716K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-3.1M$-3.1M-22.7%
Year 1$-3.2M+$478K$-2.7M-19.8%
Year 2$-3.3M+$716K$-2.6M-18.8%
Year 3$-3.4M+$716K$-2.6M-19.5%
Year 4$-3.5M+$716K$-2.7M-20.2%
Year 5$-3.6M+$716K$-2.9M-21.0%
$-30.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-31.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$-595K
Value Created
$-2.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-4.9M
Organic Growth
$7.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-2.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$136K$204K$272K$326K
Denial Rate Reductio$135K$202K$270K$324K
A/R Days Reduction$83K$124K$165K$198K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$358K$537K$716K$860K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 222 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-22.7%-14.0%1.0%10.8%
P15
Net-to-Gross35.8%19.0%30.4%48.2%
P61
Occupancy78.4%35.9%57.0%75.1%
P79
Rev/Bed$194K$301K$552K$1.1M
P10
Exp/Bed$238K$323K$489K$1.1M
P17

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML