Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CROSS CREEK HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:29 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CROSS CREEK HOSPITAL
CCN 454133 | TX | 90 beds | Current EBITDA $348K → Pro Forma $1.5M (+$1.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$21.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$348K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$829K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$1.1M
Modeled Uplift
$830K
Risk-Adjusted
-$306K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$432K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$428K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$263K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$14K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$432K$432K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$416K$12K$428K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$66K$197K$263K$829K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$14K$14K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT39.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$108K$216K$324K$432K$432K$432K$432K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$107K$214K$321K$428K$428K$428K$428K
A/R Days Reduction$0$88K$175K$263K$263K$263K$263K$263K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K
Cumulative$0$309K$619K$922K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x96% / 29.1x101% / 32.7x105% / 36.3x107% / 38.1x109% / 39.9x
9.0x91% / 25.5x96% / 28.7x100% / 31.9x102% / 33.5x104% / 35.1x
10.0x87% / 22.6x91% / 25.5x95% / 28.4x97% / 29.8x99% / 31.3x
11.0x83% / 20.3x87% / 22.9x91% / 25.5x93% / 26.8x95% / 28.1x
12.0x79% / 18.3x83% / 20.7x87% / 23.1x89% / 24.3x91% / 25.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.5x
Headroom (turns)
69%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 69% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.0x, adding 6.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$348K$348K1.6%
Year 1$358K+$758K$1.1M5.2%
Year 2$369K+$1.1M$1.5M7.0%
Year 3$380K+$1.1M$1.5M7.0%
Year 4$391K+$1.1M$1.5M7.1%
Year 5$403K+$1.1M$1.5M7.1%
$3.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$16.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$13.5M
Value Created
$1.5M
Exit EBITDA
$554K
Organic Growth
$11.4M
RCM Value Creation
$1.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$216K$324K$432K$518K
Denial Rate Reductio$214K$321K$428K$513K
A/R Days Reduction$131K$197K$263K$315K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$10K$14K$17K
Total$568K$852K$1.1M$1.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 196 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.6%-10.9%2.2%11.7%
P47
Net-to-Gross30.6%16.6%27.4%39.4%
P58
Occupancy86.4%44.1%58.5%75.3%
P90
Rev/Bed$240K$284K$562K$1.2M
P20
Exp/Bed$236K$296K$501K$1.2M
P18

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML