Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WELLBRIDGE HEALTHCARE FORT WORTH 2026-04-27 03:57 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WELLBRIDGE HEALTHCARE FORT WORTH
CCN 454128 | TX | 48 beds | Current EBITDA $-530K → Pro Forma $68K (+$599K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
EBITDA BRIDGE  ·  CCN 454128

WELLBRIDGE HEALTHCARE FORT WORTH
value-creation walk.

7-lever RCM bridge from current EBITDA to pro-forma — denial / underpay / DAR / coding / contract / cost discipline / cash acceleration. Each lever shows current vs benchmark target with data provenance.

$11.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-530K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$599K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$68K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+530bps
Margin Improvement
$433K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$599K
Modeled Uplift
$433K
Risk-Adjusted
-$166K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$226K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$226K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$137K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+9bp
Total EBITDA Impact$599K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$226K$226K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$217K$8K$226K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$35K$103K$137K$433K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$56K$113K$169K$226K$226K$226K$226K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$56K$113K$169K$226K$226K$226K$226K
A/R Days Reduction$0$46K$92K$137K$137K$137K$137K$137K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$163K$327K$486K$599K$599K$599K$599K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $599K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-65.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
72.1x
Headroom (turns)
1109%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 1109% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -65.6x, adding 164.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-530K$-530K-4.7%
Year 1$-546K+$399K$-147K-1.3%
Year 2$-562K+$599K$36K0.3%
Year 3$-579K+$599K$19K0.2%
Year 4$-597K+$599K$2K0.0%
Year 5$-615K+$599K$-16K-0.1%
$-5.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$-176K
Exit EV (11x)
$5.1M
Value Created
$-16K
Exit EBITDA
$-844K
Organic Growth
$6.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-16K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$113K$169K$226K$271K
Denial Rate Reductio$113K$169K$226K$271K
A/R Days Reduction$69K$103K$137K$165K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$299K$449K$599K$718K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 281 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-4.7%-20.9%-2.9%10.8%
P45
Net-to-Gross38.6%24.1%34.1%51.1%
P59
Occupancy82.5%23.1%50.1%72.2%
P86
Rev/Bed$235K$335K$561K$1.1M
P12
Exp/Bed$246K$367K$537K$1.2M
P14

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML