Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ROCK SPRINGS 2026-04-26 12:30 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ROCK SPRINGS
CCN 454127 | TX | 72 beds | Current EBITDA $1.1M → Pro Forma $2.4M (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$24.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$942K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$954K
Risk-Adjusted
-$338K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$491K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$486K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$299K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$16K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$491K$491K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$473K$14K$486K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$75K$224K$299K$942K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$16K$16K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$123K$246K$369K$491K$491K$491K$491K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$122K$243K$365K$486K$486K$486K$486K
A/R Days Reduction$0$100K$199K$299K$299K$299K$299K$299K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K
Cumulative$0$352K$704K$1.0M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x69% / 13.7x73% / 15.6x77% / 17.5x79% / 18.4x81% / 19.4x
9.0x64% / 11.8x68% / 13.5x72% / 15.2x74% / 16.0x76% / 16.9x
10.0x60% / 10.3x64% / 11.8x68% / 13.4x70% / 14.1x72% / 14.9x
11.0x56% / 9.1x60% / 10.5x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x68% / 13.2x
12.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.3x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.6x
Headroom (turns)
40%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 40% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.9x, adding 4.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.1M$1.1M4.5%
Year 1$1.1M+$862K$2.0M8.2%
Year 2$1.2M+$1.3M$2.5M10.1%
Year 3$1.2M+$1.3M$2.5M10.2%
Year 4$1.3M+$1.3M$2.5M10.4%
Year 5$1.3M+$1.3M$2.6M10.5%
$11.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$28.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$17.3M
Value Created
$2.6M
Exit EBITDA
$1.8M
Organic Growth
$12.9M
RCM Value Creation
$2.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$246K$369K$491K$590K
Denial Rate Reductio$243K$365K$486K$584K
A/R Days Reduction$149K$224K$299K$359K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$12K$16K$19K
Total$646K$969K$1.3M$1.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 220 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.5%-14.2%1.0%11.0%
P60
Net-to-Gross30.3%18.8%30.4%48.2%
P49
Occupancy88.6%36.6%57.1%75.3%
P95
Rev/Bed$341K$296K$544K$1.1M
P30
Exp/Bed$326K$309K$486K$1.1M
P26

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML