Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CARROLLTON SPRINGS 2026-04-26 14:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CARROLLTON SPRINGS
CCN 454119 | TX | 78 beds | Current EBITDA $966K → Pro Forma $2.7M (+$1.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$32.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$966K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$1.7M
Modeled Uplift
$1.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$450K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Commercial Payer %, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.3M (vs $1.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$652K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$646K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$397K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$21K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$652K$652K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$628K$18K$646K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$100K$297K$397K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$21K$21K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT46.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$163K$326K$489K$652K$652K$652K$652K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$161K$323K$484K$646K$646K$646K$646K
A/R Days Reduction$0$132K$264K$397K$397K$397K$397K$397K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$21K$21K$21K$21K$21K$21K
Cumulative$0$467K$934K$1.4M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x79% / 18.2x83% / 20.6x87% / 23.0x89% / 24.2x91% / 25.4x
9.0x74% / 15.8x78% / 17.9x82% / 20.1x84% / 21.1x86% / 22.2x
10.0x69% / 13.9x74% / 15.8x78% / 17.7x80% / 18.7x81% / 19.6x
11.0x65% / 12.4x70% / 14.1x74% / 15.8x76% / 16.7x77% / 17.6x
12.0x62% / 11.1x66% / 12.7x70% / 14.2x72% / 15.0x74% / 15.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.5x
Headroom (turns)
53%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 53% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.0x, adding 5.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$966K$966K3.0%
Year 1$995K+$1.1M$2.1M6.6%
Year 2$1.0M+$1.7M$2.7M8.4%
Year 3$1.1M+$1.7M$2.8M8.5%
Year 4$1.1M+$1.7M$2.8M8.6%
Year 5$1.1M+$1.7M$2.8M8.7%
$9.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$31.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$21.5M
Value Created
$2.8M
Exit EBITDA
$1.5M
Organic Growth
$17.2M
RCM Value Creation
$2.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$326K$489K$652K$783K
Denial Rate Reductio$323K$484K$646K$775K
A/R Days Reduction$198K$298K$397K$476K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$16K$21K$25K
Total$858K$1.3M$1.7M$2.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 220 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.0%-11.9%1.6%11.9%
P55
Net-to-Gross29.0%17.5%30.3%46.9%
P47
Occupancy87.9%39.8%57.3%75.0%
P93
Rev/Bed$418K$296K$554K$1.1M
P36
Exp/Bed$406K$309K$495K$1.1M
P35

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML