Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CEDAR CREST HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:44 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CEDAR CREST HOSPITAL
CCN 454114 | TX | 68 beds | Current EBITDA $9.3M → Pro Forma $11.3M (+$2.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$37.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$9.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$11.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$2.0M
Modeled Uplift
$1.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$540K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Commercial Payer %, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.4M (vs $2.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$754K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$746K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$458K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$24K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$754K$754K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$725K$21K$746K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$116K$343K$458K$1.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$24K$24K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$188K$377K$565K$754K$754K$754K$754K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$187K$373K$560K$746K$746K$746K$746K
A/R Days Reduction$0$153K$306K$458K$458K$458K$458K$458K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K
Cumulative$0$540K$1.1M$1.6M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.1x
9.0x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.6x
10.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.5x
11.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.9x41% / 5.7x43% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x
12.0x28% / 3.4x33% / 4.2x38% / 4.9x40% / 5.3x41% / 5.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.5x
Headroom (turns)
-7%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -7% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.0x, adding 1.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$9.3M$9.3M24.7%
Year 1$9.6M+$1.3M$10.9M29.0%
Year 2$9.9M+$2.0M$11.9M31.5%
Year 3$10.2M+$2.0M$12.2M32.3%
Year 4$10.5M+$2.0M$12.5M33.1%
Year 5$10.8M+$2.0M$12.8M34.0%
$93.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$140.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$47.5M
Value Created
$12.8M
Exit EBITDA
$14.9M
Organic Growth
$19.8M
RCM Value Creation
$12.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$377K$565K$754K$904K
Denial Rate Reductio$373K$560K$746K$895K
A/R Days Reduction$229K$344K$458K$550K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$18K$24K$29K
Total$991K$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 225 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin24.7%-14.4%1.0%10.9%
P92
Net-to-Gross36.8%19.1%30.5%48.4%
P63
Occupancy82.8%35.5%57.0%75.2%
P84
Rev/Bed$554K$303K$553K$1.1M
P50
Exp/Bed$417K$326K$490K$1.1M
P37

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML