Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CYPRESS CREEK HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 17:34 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CYPRESS CREEK HOSPITAL
CCN 454108 | TX | 128 beds | Current EBITDA $2.7M → Pro Forma $4.1M (+$1.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$26.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$1.4M
Modeled Uplift
$982K
Risk-Adjusted
-$422K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$534K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$528K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$325K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$17K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$534K$534K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$514K$15K$528K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$82K$243K$325K$1.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$17K$17K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$133K$267K$400K$534K$534K$534K$534K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$132K$264K$396K$528K$528K$528K$528K
A/R Days Reduction$0$108K$216K$325K$325K$325K$325K$325K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K
Cumulative$0$382K$764K$1.1M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x55% / 9.0x60% / 10.4x64% / 11.7x65% / 12.4x67% / 13.1x
9.0x50% / 7.6x55% / 8.8x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x
10.0x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x
11.0x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
12.0x38% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.9x
Headroom (turns)
14%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 14% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.6x, adding 2.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.7M$2.7M10.2%
Year 1$2.8M+$936K$3.7M14.0%
Year 2$2.9M+$1.4M$4.3M16.1%
Year 3$3.0M+$1.4M$4.4M16.4%
Year 4$3.1M+$1.4M$4.5M16.8%
Year 5$3.2M+$1.4M$4.6M17.1%
$27.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$50.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$22.9M
Value Created
$4.6M
Exit EBITDA
$4.3M
Organic Growth
$14.0M
RCM Value Creation
$4.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$267K$400K$534K$640K
Denial Rate Reductio$264K$396K$528K$634K
A/R Days Reduction$162K$243K$325K$390K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$13K$17K$20K
Total$702K$1.1M$1.4M$1.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 173 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin10.2%-8.8%2.3%13.0%
P69
Net-to-Gross34.2%15.2%23.6%34.2%
P75
Occupancy73.7%46.7%62.4%75.4%
P71
Rev/Bed$208K$321K$876K$1.4M
P12
Exp/Bed$187K$339K$778K$1.3M
P8

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML