Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UBH DENTON HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 13:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UBH DENTON HOSPITAL
CCN 454104 | TX | 104 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.6M → Pro Forma $-593K (+$1.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$19.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-593K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$731K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$1.0M
Modeled Uplift
$666K
Risk-Adjusted
-$336K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Payer Diversity, Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$381K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$377K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$232K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$12K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$381K$381K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$367K$10K$377K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$58K$173K$232K$731K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$12K$12K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT36.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$95K$190K$286K$381K$381K$381K$381K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$94K$189K$283K$377K$377K$377K$377K
A/R Days Reduction$0$77K$155K$232K$232K$232K$232K$232K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K
Cumulative$0$273K$546K$812K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.6M$-1.6M-8.4%
Year 1$-1.6M+$668K$-975K-5.1%
Year 2$-1.7M+$1.0M$-690K-3.6%
Year 3$-1.7M+$1.0M$-741K-3.9%
Year 4$-1.8M+$1.0M$-793K-4.2%
Year 5$-1.8M+$1.0M$-847K-4.4%
$-15.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$-9.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$6.6M
Value Created
$-847K
Exit EBITDA
$-2.5M
Organic Growth
$10.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-847K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$190K$286K$381K$457K
Denial Rate Reductio$189K$283K$377K$453K
A/R Days Reduction$116K$174K$232K$278K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$12K$15K
Total$501K$751K$1.0M$1.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 191 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-8.4%-9.9%2.2%11.7%
P27
Net-to-Gross37.0%16.2%25.2%36.7%
P76
Occupancy57.0%44.5%59.7%75.3%
P45
Rev/Bed$183K$289K$576K$1.2M
P8
Exp/Bed$198K$308K$563K$1.2M
P10

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML