Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KINGWOOD PINES HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KINGWOOD PINES HOSPITAL
CCN 454103 | TX | 116 beds | Current EBITDA $3.1M → Pro Forma $4.5M (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$25.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$969K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$923K
Risk-Adjusted
-$405K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$505K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$500K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$307K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$16K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$505K$505K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$486K$14K$500K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$78K$230K$307K$969K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$16K$16K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT36.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$126K$253K$379K$505K$505K$505K$505K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$125K$250K$375K$500K$500K$500K$500K
A/R Days Reduction$0$102K$205K$307K$307K$307K$307K$307K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K
Cumulative$0$362K$724K$1.1M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.6x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.2x
9.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x
10.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x
11.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x
12.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.6x
Headroom (turns)
9%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 9% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.9x, adding 2.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.1M$3.1M12.4%
Year 1$3.2M+$886K$4.1M16.3%
Year 2$3.3M+$1.3M$4.6M18.4%
Year 3$3.4M+$1.3M$4.7M18.8%
Year 4$3.5M+$1.3M$4.9M19.2%
Year 5$3.6M+$1.3M$5.0M19.6%
$31.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$54.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$23.2M
Value Created
$5.0M
Exit EBITDA
$5.0M
Organic Growth
$13.3M
RCM Value Creation
$5.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$253K$379K$505K$606K
Denial Rate Reductio$250K$375K$500K$600K
A/R Days Reduction$154K$231K$307K$369K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$12K$16K$19K
Total$664K$997K$1.3M$1.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 188 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin12.4%-9.2%2.2%11.6%
P76
Net-to-Gross39.5%16.1%24.4%36.6%
P78
Occupancy71.7%46.4%62.5%75.5%
P66
Rev/Bed$218K$317K$605K$1.3M
P15
Exp/Bed$191K$337K$616K$1.2M
P10

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML