Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEDICAL CITY GREEN OAKS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:06 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEDICAL CITY GREEN OAKS HOSPITAL
CCN 454094 | TX | 124 beds | Current EBITDA $-6.0M → Pro Forma $-4.0M (+$1.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$36.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-6.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-4.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$1.9M
Modeled Uplift
$1.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$534K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.4M (vs $1.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$738K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$731K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$449K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$24K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$738K$738K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$710K$20K$731K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$113K$336K$449K$1.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$24K$24K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$184K$369K$553K$738K$738K$738K$738K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$183K$365K$548K$731K$731K$731K$731K
A/R Days Reduction$0$150K$299K$449K$449K$449K$449K$449K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K
Cumulative$0$529K$1.1M$1.6M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-6.0M$-6.0M-16.2%
Year 1$-6.2M+$1.3M$-4.9M-13.2%
Year 2$-6.3M+$1.9M$-4.4M-11.9%
Year 3$-6.5M+$1.9M$-4.6M-12.4%
Year 4$-6.7M+$1.9M$-4.8M-13.0%
Year 5$-6.9M+$1.9M$-5.0M-13.5%
$-59.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-54.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$4.9M
Value Created
$-5.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-9.5M
Organic Growth
$19.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-5.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$369K$553K$738K$886K
Denial Rate Reductio$365K$548K$731K$877K
A/R Days Reduction$224K$337K$449K$539K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$18K$24K$28K
Total$971K$1.5M$1.9M$2.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 173 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-16.2%-8.8%2.3%12.4%
P16
Net-to-Gross27.4%16.0%24.0%34.5%
P59
Occupancy84.2%46.7%62.4%75.2%
P89
Rev/Bed$298K$312K$843K$1.3M
P24
Exp/Bed$346K$332K$763K$1.3M
P27

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML