Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — GLEN OAKS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 17:21 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — GLEN OAKS HOSPITAL
CCN 454050 | TX | 54 beds | Current EBITDA $-366K → Pro Forma $281K (+$647K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$12.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-366K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$647K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$281K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+529bps
Margin Improvement
$470K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$647K
Modeled Uplift
$474K
Risk-Adjusted
-$174K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$245K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$244K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$149K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+8bp
Total EBITDA Impact$647K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$245K$245K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$236K$8K$244K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$38K$111K$149K$470K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$61K$122K$184K$245K$245K$245K$245K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$61K$122K$183K$244K$244K$244K$244K
A/R Days Reduction$0$50K$99K$149K$149K$149K$149K$149K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$177K$353K$525K$647K$647K$647K$647K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $647K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-11.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
17.5x
Headroom (turns)
269%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 269% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -11.0x, adding 110.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-366K$-366K-3.0%
Year 1$-377K+$432K$55K0.4%
Year 2$-388K+$647K$259K2.1%
Year 3$-400K+$647K$247K2.0%
Year 4$-412K+$647K$235K1.9%
Year 5$-424K+$647K$223K1.8%
$-3.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$2.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$6.1M
Value Created
$223K
Exit EBITDA
$-583K
Organic Growth
$6.5M
RCM Value Creation
$223K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$122K$184K$245K$294K
Denial Rate Reductio$122K$183K$244K$293K
A/R Days Reduction$75K$112K$149K$179K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$324K$486K$647K$777K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 230 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.0%-14.4%0.2%11.7%
P45
Net-to-Gross33.8%20.1%31.1%51.0%
P52
Occupancy86.3%32.0%55.9%73.6%
P91
Rev/Bed$227K$326K$530K$1.0M
P14
Exp/Bed$234K$330K$495K$1.1M
P12

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML