Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ASCENSION SETON SHOAL CREEK 2026-04-26 14:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ASCENSION SETON SHOAL CREEK
CCN 454029 | TX | 54 beds | Current EBITDA $803K → Pro Forma $1.3M (+$534K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$10.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$803K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$534K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+532bps
Margin Improvement
$385K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$534K
Modeled Uplift
$362K
Risk-Adjusted
-$172K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$201K
+201bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$201K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$122K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+10bp
Total EBITDA Impact$534K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$193K$8K$201K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$201K$201K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$31K$91K$122K$385K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$50K$101K$151K$201K$201K$201K$201K
Cost to Collect$0$50K$100K$151K$201K$201K$201K$201K
A/R Days Reduction$0$41K$81K$122K$122K$122K$122K$122K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$146K$292K$433K$534K$534K$534K$534K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $534K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.6x67% / 13.1x69% / 13.8x71% / 14.5x
9.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x
10.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x61% / 11.0x
11.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.2x57% / 9.7x
12.0x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.4x
Headroom (turns)
22%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 22% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.1x, adding 3.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$803K$803K8.0%
Year 1$827K+$356K$1.2M11.8%
Year 2$852K+$534K$1.4M13.8%
Year 3$877K+$534K$1.4M14.1%
Year 4$904K+$534K$1.4M14.3%
Year 5$931K+$534K$1.5M14.6%
$8.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$16.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$8.1M
Value Created
$1.5M
Exit EBITDA
$1.3M
Organic Growth
$5.3M
RCM Value Creation
$1.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$101K$151K$201K$242K
Cost to Collect$100K$151K$201K$241K
A/R Days Reduction$61K$92K$122K$147K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$267K$400K$534K$641K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 230 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-14.4%0.2%11.7%
P0
Net-to-Gross26.0%20.1%31.1%51.0%
P37
Occupancy59.8%32.0%55.9%73.6%
P57
Rev/Bed$186K$326K$530K$1.0M
P9
Exp/Bed$414K$330K$495K$1.1M
P35

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML