Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WEST OAKS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WEST OAKS HOSPITAL
CCN 454026 | TX | 160 beds | Current EBITDA $3.9M → Pro Forma $5.9M (+$2.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$39.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$2.1M
Modeled Uplift
$1.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$586K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.5M (vs $2.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$780K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$772K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$475K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$25K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$780K$780K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$751K$21K$772K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$120K$355K$475K$1.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$25K$25K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$195K$390K$585K$780K$780K$780K$780K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$193K$386K$579K$772K$772K$772K$772K
A/R Days Reduction$0$158K$316K$475K$475K$475K$475K$475K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$25K$25K$25K$25K$25K$25K
Cumulative$0$559K$1.1M$1.7M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x55% / 9.1x60% / 10.4x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x68% / 13.2x
9.0x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x
10.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.4x58% / 9.9x
11.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x
12.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.3x50% / 7.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.0x
Headroom (turns)
15%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 15% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.5x, adding 2.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.9M$3.9M10.0%
Year 1$4.0M+$1.4M$5.4M13.8%
Year 2$4.1M+$2.1M$6.2M15.9%
Year 3$4.3M+$2.1M$6.3M16.2%
Year 4$4.4M+$2.1M$6.4M16.5%
Year 5$4.5M+$2.1M$6.6M16.8%
$38.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$72.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$33.3M
Value Created
$6.6M
Exit EBITDA
$6.2M
Organic Growth
$20.5M
RCM Value Creation
$6.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$390K$585K$780K$936K
Denial Rate Reductio$386K$579K$772K$927K
A/R Days Reduction$237K$356K$475K$569K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$19K$25K$30K
Total$1.0M$1.5M$2.1M$2.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 165 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin10.0%-8.4%2.8%14.2%
P64
Net-to-Gross35.3%14.1%21.3%31.2%
P83
Occupancy81.9%48.4%63.6%73.9%
P87
Rev/Bed$244K$357K$1.0M$1.5M
P18
Exp/Bed$219K$393K$952K$1.3M
P13

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML