Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — RUSK STATE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:34 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — RUSK STATE HOSPITAL
CCN 454009 | TX | 361 beds | Current EBITDA $-29.7M → Pro Forma $-27.4M (+$2.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$43.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-29.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-27.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$2.3M
Modeled Uplift
$1.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$918K
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Payer Diversity. Risks: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.4M (vs $2.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$875K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$866K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$532K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$28K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$875K$875K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$842K$24K$866K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$134K$398K$532K$1.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$28K$28K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT24.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$219K$437K$656K$875K$875K$875K$875K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$217K$433K$650K$866K$866K$866K$866K
A/R Days Reduction$0$177K$355K$532K$532K$532K$532K$532K
Clean Claim Rate$0$14K$28K$28K$28K$28K$28K$28K
Cumulative$0$627K$1.3M$1.9M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-29.7M$-29.7M-68.0%
Year 1$-30.6M+$1.5M$-29.1M-66.5%
Year 2$-31.6M+$2.3M$-29.3M-66.9%
Year 3$-32.5M+$2.3M$-30.2M-69.0%
Year 4$-33.5M+$2.3M$-31.2M-71.3%
Year 5$-34.5M+$2.3M$-32.2M-73.6%
$-297.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$-354.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$-56.5M
Value Created
$-32.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-47.4M
Organic Growth
$23.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-32.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$437K$656K$875K$1.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$433K$650K$866K$1.0M
A/R Days Reduction$266K$399K$532K$639K
Clean Claim Rate$14K$21K$28K$34K
Total$1.2M$1.7M$2.3M$2.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 110 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-8.2%4.5%14.7%
P0
Net-to-Gross100.0%12.9%18.1%24.9%
P96
Occupancy46.8%60.6%68.9%77.8%
P10
Rev/Bed$121K$1.0M$1.3M$1.6M
P2
Exp/Bed$204K$873K$1.2M$1.6M
P1

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML