Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NTSH - WITCHITA FALLS & VERNON 2026-04-26 14:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NTSH - WITCHITA FALLS & VERNON
CCN 454008 | TX | 603 beds | Current EBITDA $4.4M → Pro Forma $7.3M (+$2.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$55.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$7.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$2.9M
Modeled Uplift
$1.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.2M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Payer Diversity, Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.7M (vs $2.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$673K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$35K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.1M$1.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.1M$30K$1.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$170K$503K$673K$2.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$35K$35K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT25.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$276K$553K$829K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$274K$547K$821K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$224K$449K$673K$673K$673K$673K$673K
Clean Claim Rate$0$18K$35K$35K$35K$35K$35K$35K
Cumulative$0$792K$1.6M$2.4M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.0x63% / 11.5x67% / 13.0x69% / 13.7x71% / 14.5x
9.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x
10.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.7x60% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x
11.0x45% / 6.4x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x
12.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.4x
Headroom (turns)
21%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 21% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.1x, adding 3.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.4M$4.4M8.0%
Year 1$4.6M+$1.9M$6.5M11.7%
Year 2$4.7M+$2.9M$7.6M13.7%
Year 3$4.8M+$2.9M$7.7M14.0%
Year 4$5.0M+$2.9M$7.9M14.3%
Year 5$5.1M+$2.9M$8.0M14.5%
$44.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$88.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$44.2M
Value Created
$8.0M
Exit EBITDA
$7.0M
Organic Growth
$29.1M
RCM Value Creation
$8.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$553K$829K$1.1M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$547K$821K$1.1M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$336K$505K$673K$807K
Clean Claim Rate$18K$27K$35K$42K
Total$1.5M$2.2M$2.9M$3.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 57 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-17.0%2.8%12.6%
P0
Net-to-Gross100.0%13.4%18.3%25.8%
P95
Occupancy56.4%65.6%73.7%80.4%
P12
Rev/Bed$92K$1.2M$1.4M$1.8M
P0
Exp/Bed$218K$1.0M$1.5M$1.9M
P2

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML