Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER OF PLANO 2026-04-26 09:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER OF PLANO
CCN 453316 | TX | 72 beds | Current EBITDA $70.5M → Pro Forma $88.2M (+$17.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$336.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$70.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$17.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$88.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$12.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$17.7M
Modeled Uplift
$13.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.5M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $13.2M (vs $17.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$215K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$17.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.7M$6.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.5M$185K$6.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.0M$3.1M$4.1M$12.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$215K$215K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.7M$3.4M$5.1M$6.7M$6.7M$6.7M$6.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.7M$3.3M$5.0M$6.7M$6.7M$6.7M$6.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.4M$2.7M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$108K$215K$215K$215K$215K$215K$215K
Cumulative$0$4.8M$9.6M$14.4M$17.7M$17.7M$17.7M$17.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $17.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.4x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x
9.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
10.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x
11.0x34% / 4.2x38% / 5.1x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x
12.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.3x
Headroom (turns)
-4%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -4% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.8x, adding 1.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$70.5M$70.5M20.9%
Year 1$72.6M+$11.8M$84.4M25.1%
Year 2$74.8M+$17.7M$92.5M27.5%
Year 3$77.0M+$17.7M$94.7M28.1%
Year 4$79.3M+$17.7M$97.0M28.8%
Year 5$81.7M+$17.7M$99.4M29.5%
$704.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.09B
Exit EV (11x)
$388.8M
Value Created
$99.4M
Exit EBITDA
$112.3M
Organic Growth
$177.1M
RCM Value Creation
$99.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.4M$5.1M$6.7M$8.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.3M$5.0M$6.7M$8.0M
A/R Days Reduction$2.0M$3.1M$4.1M$4.9M
Clean Claim Rate$108K$162K$215K$259K
Total$8.9M$13.3M$17.7M$21.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 220 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin20.9%-14.2%1.0%11.0%
P89
Net-to-Gross47.9%18.8%30.4%48.2%
P74
Occupancy65.3%36.6%57.1%75.3%
P62
Rev/Bed$4.7M$296K$544K$1.1M
P98
Exp/Bed$3.7M$309K$486K$1.1M
P99

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML