Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — COVENANT CHILDRENS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:29 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — COVENANT CHILDRENS HOSPITAL
CCN 453306 | TX | 181 beds | Current EBITDA $63.6M → Pro Forma $85.2M (+$21.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$410.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$63.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$21.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$85.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$15.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$21.6M
Modeled Uplift
$14.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$7.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Payer Diversity. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $14.2M (vs $21.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$263K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$21.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.2M$8.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.9M$226K$8.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.3M$3.7M$5.0M$15.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$263K$263K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.1M$4.1M$6.2M$8.2M$8.2M$8.2M$8.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.0M$4.1M$6.1M$8.1M$8.1M$8.1M$8.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.7M$3.3M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$131K$263K$263K$263K$263K$263K$263K
Cumulative$0$5.9M$11.8M$17.5M$21.6M$21.6M$21.6M$21.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $21.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x
9.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x
10.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x49% / 7.5x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.4x
11.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x
12.0x32% / 4.1x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.2x
Headroom (turns)
3%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 3% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.3x, adding 2.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$63.6M$63.6M15.5%
Year 1$65.6M+$14.4M$79.9M19.5%
Year 2$67.5M+$21.6M$89.1M21.7%
Year 3$69.5M+$21.6M$91.1M22.2%
Year 4$71.6M+$21.6M$93.2M22.7%
Year 5$73.8M+$21.6M$95.4M23.2%
$636.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.05B
Exit EV (11x)
$412.6M
Value Created
$95.4M
Exit EBITDA
$101.4M
Organic Growth
$215.9M
RCM Value Creation
$95.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.1M$6.2M$8.2M$9.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.1M$6.1M$8.1M$9.7M
A/R Days Reduction$2.5M$3.7M$5.0M$6.0M
Clean Claim Rate$131K$197K$263K$315K
Total$10.8M$16.2M$21.6M$25.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 158 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin15.5%-9.8%3.3%13.6%
P78
Net-to-Gross21.9%13.8%19.4%29.3%
P56
Occupancy41.3%49.6%64.4%73.9%
P15
Rev/Bed$2.3M$501K$1.1M$1.5M
P96
Exp/Bed$1.9M$508K$1.0M$1.4M
P93

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML