Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — DRISCOLL CHILDRENS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — DRISCOLL CHILDRENS HOSPITAL
CCN 453301 | TX | 215 beds | Current EBITDA $204.3M → Pro Forma $240.8M (+$36.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$694.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$204.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$36.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$240.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$26.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$36.5M
Modeled Uplift
$24.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$11.7M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Payer Diversity. Risks: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $24.9M (vs $36.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$13.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$13.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$8.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$444K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$36.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$13.9M$13.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$13.4M$382K$13.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.1M$6.3M$8.4M$26.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$444K$444K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.5M$6.9M$10.4M$13.9M$13.9M$13.9M$13.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.4M$6.9M$10.3M$13.7M$13.7M$13.7M$13.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.8M$5.6M$8.4M$8.4M$8.4M$8.4M$8.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$222K$444K$444K$444K$444K$444K$444K
Cumulative$0$9.9M$19.9M$29.6M$36.5M$36.5M$36.5M$36.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $36.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x
9.0x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.3x
10.0x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x
11.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x40% / 5.5x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x
12.0x27% / 3.3x32% / 4.0x36% / 4.7x38% / 5.1x40% / 5.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.7x
Headroom (turns)
-10%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -10% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.2x, adding 1.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$204.3M$204.3M29.4%
Year 1$210.4M+$24.4M$234.8M33.8%
Year 2$216.7M+$36.5M$253.2M36.5%
Year 3$223.2M+$36.5M$259.7M37.4%
Year 4$229.9M+$36.5M$266.4M38.4%
Year 5$236.8M+$36.5M$273.3M39.4%
$2.04B
Entry EV (10x)
$3.01B
Exit EV (11x)
$964.0M
Value Created
$273.3M
Exit EBITDA
$325.4M
Organic Growth
$365.3M
RCM Value Creation
$273.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.9M$10.4M$13.9M$16.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.9M$10.3M$13.7M$16.5M
A/R Days Reduction$4.2M$6.3M$8.4M$10.1M
Clean Claim Rate$222K$333K$444K$533K
Total$18.3M$27.4M$36.5M$43.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 149 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin29.4%-6.7%5.4%13.9%
P97
Net-to-Gross42.8%13.5%18.9%28.1%
P91
Occupancy49.4%50.1%65.6%75.4%
P24
Rev/Bed$3.2M$613K$1.2M$1.5M
P96
Exp/Bed$2.3M$636K$1.0M$1.5M
P94

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML