Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — COOK CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 04:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — COOK CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 453300 | TX | 423 beds | Current EBITDA $249.1M → Pro Forma $328.3M (+$79.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.51B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$249.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$79.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$328.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$57.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$79.3M
Modeled Uplift
$54.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$25.3M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $54.0M (vs $79.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$30.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$29.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$18.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$965K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$79.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$30.1M$30.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$29.0M$829K$29.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$4.6M$13.7M$18.3M$57.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$965K$965K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT25.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$7.5M$15.1M$22.6M$30.1M$30.1M$30.1M$30.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$7.5M$14.9M$22.4M$29.8M$29.8M$29.8M$29.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$6.1M$12.2M$18.3M$18.3M$18.3M$18.3M$18.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$482K$965K$965K$965K$965K$965K$965K
Cumulative$0$21.6M$43.2M$64.3M$79.3M$79.3M$79.3M$79.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $79.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.8x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x
9.0x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x
10.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x
11.0x36% / 4.6x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x
12.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.1x
Headroom (turns)
1%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 1% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.4x, adding 2.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$249.1M$249.1M16.5%
Year 1$256.5M+$52.9M$309.4M20.5%
Year 2$264.2M+$79.3M$343.5M22.8%
Year 3$272.1M+$79.3M$351.4M23.3%
Year 4$280.3M+$79.3M$359.6M23.9%
Year 5$288.7M+$79.3M$368.0M24.4%
$2.49B
Entry EV (10x)
$4.05B
Exit EV (11x)
$1.56B
Value Created
$368.0M
Exit EBITDA
$396.7M
Organic Growth
$792.9M
RCM Value Creation
$368.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$15.1M$22.6M$30.1M$36.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$14.9M$22.4M$29.8M$35.8M
A/R Days Reduction$9.2M$13.8M$18.3M$22.0M
Clean Claim Rate$482K$723K$965K$1.2M
Total$39.6M$59.5M$79.3M$95.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 94 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin16.5%-9.4%4.6%15.3%
P76
Net-to-Gross48.9%12.5%18.1%25.2%
P94
Occupancy57.3%63.8%69.3%78.8%
P16
Rev/Bed$3.6M$1.1M$1.4M$1.7M
P97
Exp/Bed$3.0M$944K$1.3M$1.7M
P91

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML