Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SOUTH TEXAS REHABILITATION HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SOUTH TEXAS REHABILITATION HOSPITAL
CCN 453092 | TX | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $1.2M → Pro Forma $2.1M (+$876K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$16.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$876K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$638K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$876K
Modeled Uplift
$612K
Risk-Adjusted
-$263K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$333K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$330K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$203K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$876K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$333K$333K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$320K$9K$330K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$51K$151K$203K$638K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$83K$166K$250K$333K$333K$333K$333K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$82K$165K$247K$330K$330K$330K$330K
A/R Days Reduction$0$68K$135K$203K$203K$203K$203K$203K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$238K$477K$710K$876K$876K$876K$876K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $876K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x60% / 10.6x65% / 12.1x69% / 13.7x71% / 14.4x72% / 15.2x
9.0x55% / 9.0x60% / 10.4x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x67% / 13.1x
10.0x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.0x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.5x
11.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x
12.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.0x54% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.6x
Headroom (turns)
25%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 25% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.9x, adding 3.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.2M$1.2M7.2%
Year 1$1.2M+$584K$1.8M10.9%
Year 2$1.3M+$876K$2.1M12.9%
Year 3$1.3M+$876K$2.2M13.1%
Year 4$1.3M+$876K$2.2M13.4%
Year 5$1.4M+$876K$2.3M13.6%
$12.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$24.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$12.9M
Value Created
$2.3M
Exit EBITDA
$1.9M
Organic Growth
$8.8M
RCM Value Creation
$2.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$166K$250K$333K$400K
Denial Rate Reductio$165K$247K$330K$396K
A/R Days Reduction$101K$152K$203K$243K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$8K$11K$13K
Total$438K$657K$876K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 287 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.2%-23.7%-2.9%10.4%
P69
Net-to-Gross61.1%24.4%34.4%51.0%
P84
Occupancy69.6%19.3%44.2%69.4%
P75
Rev/Bed$416K$371K$584K$1.2M
P29
Exp/Bed$386K$402K$631K$1.3M
P23

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML