Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WESLACO REGIONAL REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 17:20 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WESLACO REGIONAL REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 453091 | TX | 32 beds | Current EBITDA $-324K → Pro Forma $234K (+$559K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$10.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-324K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$559K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$234K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+531bps
Margin Improvement
$404K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$559K
Modeled Uplift
$380K
Risk-Adjusted
-$179K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$211K
+200bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$210K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$128K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+9bp
Total EBITDA Impact$559K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$203K$8K$211K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$210K$210K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$32K$96K$128K$404K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$53K$105K$158K$211K$211K$211K$211K
Cost to Collect$0$53K$105K$158K$210K$210K$210K$210K
A/R Days Reduction$0$43K$85K$128K$128K$128K$128K$128K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$153K$306K$454K$559K$559K$559K$559K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $559K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-11.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
18.2x
Headroom (turns)
280%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 280% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -11.7x, adding 110.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-324K$-324K-3.1%
Year 1$-334K+$373K$38K0.4%
Year 2$-344K+$559K$215K2.0%
Year 3$-355K+$559K$204K1.9%
Year 4$-365K+$559K$194K1.8%
Year 5$-376K+$559K$183K1.7%
$-3.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$2.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$5.3M
Value Created
$183K
Exit EBITDA
$-517K
Organic Growth
$5.6M
RCM Value Creation
$183K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$105K$158K$211K$253K
Cost to Collect$105K$158K$210K$253K
A/R Days Reduction$64K$96K$128K$154K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$279K$419K$559K$671K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 274 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.1%-28.4%-3.9%10.3%
P51
Net-to-Gross60.1%24.4%35.3%51.8%
P82
Occupancy61.5%16.4%36.0%64.5%
P73
Rev/Bed$329K$415K$617K$1.2M
P17
Exp/Bed$339K$425K$751K$1.4M
P15

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML