Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 05:22 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 453059 | TX | 84 beds | Current EBITDA $-450K → Pro Forma $550K (+$1000K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$19.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-450K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1000K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$550K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$729K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$1000K
Modeled Uplift
$618K
Risk-Adjusted
-$382K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$380K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$376K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$231K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$12K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1000K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$380K$380K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$366K$10K$376K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$58K$173K$231K$729K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$12K$12K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT40.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$95K$190K$285K$380K$380K$380K$380K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$94K$188K$282K$376K$376K$376K$376K
A/R Days Reduction$0$77K$154K$231K$231K$231K$231K$231K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K
Cumulative$0$272K$545K$811K$1000K$1000K$1000K$1000K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1000K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-6.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
13.4x
Headroom (turns)
207%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 207% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -6.9x, adding 105.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-450K$-450K-2.4%
Year 1$-464K+$667K$203K1.1%
Year 2$-478K+$1000K$522K2.7%
Year 3$-492K+$1000K$508K2.7%
Year 4$-507K+$1000K$493K2.6%
Year 5$-522K+$1000K$478K2.5%
$-4.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$5.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$9.8M
Value Created
$478K
Exit EBITDA
$-717K
Organic Growth
$10.0M
RCM Value Creation
$478K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$190K$285K$380K$456K
Denial Rate Reductio$188K$282K$376K$452K
A/R Days Reduction$116K$173K$231K$278K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$12K$15K
Total$500K$750K$1000K$1.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 205 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-2.4%-11.5%2.0%11.7%
P41
Net-to-Gross80.4%16.8%27.8%40.9%
P97
Occupancy34.4%43.3%58.1%75.2%
P19
Rev/Bed$226K$284K$555K$1.2M
P17
Exp/Bed$232K$297K$495K$1.1M
P17

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML