Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 14:31 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 453057 | TX | 80 beds | Current EBITDA $3.1M → Pro Forma $4.4M (+$1.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$26.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$1.4M
Modeled Uplift
$1.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$356K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$523K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$518K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$318K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$17K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$523K$523K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$503K$14K$518K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$80K$238K$318K$1.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$17K$17K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT45.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$131K$262K$392K$523K$523K$523K$523K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$129K$259K$388K$518K$518K$518K$518K
A/R Days Reduction$0$106K$212K$318K$318K$318K$318K$318K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K
Cumulative$0$375K$749K$1.1M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x53% / 8.5x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.4x
9.0x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x
10.0x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
11.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x
12.0x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.7x
Headroom (turns)
10%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 10% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.8x, adding 2.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.1M$3.1M11.7%
Year 1$3.2M+$917K$4.1M15.6%
Year 2$3.3M+$1.4M$4.6M17.7%
Year 3$3.4M+$1.4M$4.7M18.1%
Year 4$3.5M+$1.4M$4.8M18.5%
Year 5$3.6M+$1.4M$4.9M18.9%
$30.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$54.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$23.6M
Value Created
$4.9M
Exit EBITDA
$4.9M
Organic Growth
$13.8M
RCM Value Creation
$4.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$262K$392K$523K$628K
Denial Rate Reductio$259K$388K$518K$621K
A/R Days Reduction$159K$239K$318K$382K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$13K$17K$20K
Total$688K$1.0M$1.4M$1.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 224 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin11.7%-12.3%1.8%11.7%
P74
Net-to-Gross68.2%17.5%29.6%45.9%
P91
Occupancy88.5%39.8%57.3%75.0%
P94
Rev/Bed$327K$291K$554K$1.1M
P29
Exp/Bed$289K$309K$489K$1.1M
P22

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML