Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 14:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 453053 | TX | 60 beds | Current EBITDA $921K → Pro Forma $1.7M (+$800K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$15.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$921K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$800K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$583K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$800K
Modeled Uplift
$563K
Risk-Adjusted
-$237K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$304K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$301K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$185K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$800K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$304K$304K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$293K$8K$301K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$47K$138K$185K$583K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT49.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$76K$152K$228K$304K$304K$304K$304K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$75K$151K$226K$301K$301K$301K$301K
A/R Days Reduction$0$62K$123K$185K$185K$185K$185K$185K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$218K$436K$649K$800K$800K$800K$800K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $800K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x63% / 11.6x68% / 13.2x72% / 14.9x73% / 15.7x75% / 16.5x
9.0x58% / 9.9x63% / 11.4x67% / 12.9x69% / 13.6x70% / 14.3x
10.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.3x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x
11.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x
12.0x46% / 6.6x51% / 7.7x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.4x58% / 9.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.0x
Headroom (turns)
30%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 30% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.5x, adding 3.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$921K$921K6.1%
Year 1$948K+$533K$1.5M9.7%
Year 2$977K+$800K$1.8M11.7%
Year 3$1.0M+$800K$1.8M11.9%
Year 4$1.0M+$800K$1.8M12.1%
Year 5$1.1M+$800K$1.9M12.3%
$9.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$20.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$11.3M
Value Created
$1.9M
Exit EBITDA
$1.5M
Organic Growth
$8.0M
RCM Value Creation
$1.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$152K$228K$304K$365K
Denial Rate Reductio$151K$226K$301K$361K
A/R Days Reduction$93K$139K$185K$222K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$400K$600K$800K$960K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 232 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin6.1%-14.4%0.1%11.4%
P63
Net-to-Gross67.5%19.4%30.6%49.7%
P90
Occupancy68.5%33.2%56.1%72.4%
P69
Rev/Bed$254K$318K$544K$1.1M
P18
Exp/Bed$238K$327K$492K$1.1M
P16

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML