Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 17:20 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 453047 | TX | 83 beds | Current EBITDA $6.0M → Pro Forma $7.9M (+$1.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$36.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$6.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$7.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$1.9M
Modeled Uplift
$1.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$552K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.4M (vs $1.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$738K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$731K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$449K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$24K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$738K$738K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$711K$20K$731K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$113K$336K$449K$1.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$24K$24K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT40.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$185K$369K$554K$738K$738K$738K$738K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$183K$365K$548K$731K$731K$731K$731K
A/R Days Reduction$0$150K$299K$449K$449K$449K$449K$449K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K
Cumulative$0$529K$1.1M$1.6M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.6x55% / 8.8x59% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x
9.0x45% / 6.4x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x55% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x
10.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x
11.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.3x
12.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.1x
Headroom (turns)
2%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 2% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.4x, adding 2.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$6.0M$6.0M16.1%
Year 1$6.1M+$1.3M$7.4M20.1%
Year 2$6.3M+$1.9M$8.3M22.4%
Year 3$6.5M+$1.9M$8.5M22.9%
Year 4$6.7M+$1.9M$8.7M23.4%
Year 5$6.9M+$1.9M$8.9M24.0%
$59.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$97.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$37.8M
Value Created
$8.9M
Exit EBITDA
$9.5M
Organic Growth
$19.4M
RCM Value Creation
$8.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$369K$554K$738K$886K
Denial Rate Reductio$365K$548K$731K$877K
A/R Days Reduction$225K$337K$449K$539K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$18K$24K$28K
Total$971K$1.5M$1.9M$2.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 205 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin16.1%-11.5%2.0%11.7%
P84
Net-to-Gross69.2%16.8%27.8%40.9%
P92
Occupancy74.0%43.3%58.1%75.2%
P74
Rev/Bed$445K$284K$555K$1.2M
P39
Exp/Bed$373K$297K$495K$1.1M
P32

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML